![]() You can’t really utilize it at all except for controlling the session. This is actually really cool because you are actually using tmux just like you would with multiple panes into different servers etc.but its all actually just a tmux session! What sucks here is that you have to keep the “tmux -CC” shell open (minimized works too) for iterm to keep its connection to tmux. Tmux -CC #start a new session spawning a new iterm window tmux -CC attach #reattach to that session which spawns the iterm window with everything the way it was How does this work? You actually utilize tmux as follows: The idea is that iTerm still handles window and pane management, maintain scrollback buffers. So I did some searching and found out about iterm2?s actually pretty sweet tmux intergration! There is an integration between iTerm2 and tmux powered by iTerm that you might be interesting in. Except for again, this doesn’t work when using tmux since iterm doesn’t know about tmux’es panes. The other thing that would be nice is being able to use iterm2?s broadcast feature where you can enter a command that gets replicated on all your other panes. Note that this will select everything in the current pane and pane next to it as well since iterm sees all the tmux panes as one pane/window. You can get around this by holding Alt/Option when selecting text. One key thing that you loose using tmux is the ability to use copy/paste efficiently since when you highlight something, that is registered at the tmux level, not the OS/iterm2 level. You can search google for sample configs if you’d like to fiddle more. I also enabled the tmux plugin for oh-my-zsh which adds a few nice features, primarily allowing you to not have to type “attach”. #enable mouse support setw -g mode-mouse on set -g mouse-select-pane on set -g mouse-resize-pane on set -g mouse-select-window on One of the key things I loved about it was the epic mouse integration for scrolling, selecting panes, and resizing panes: Maloader ? "Running all Mac binaries isn't my goal.So I experienced tmux last week for not the first time but the “definitive time” where I actually played/studied it and configured it to my liking.Darling ? It uses a Wine-like approach but "At this point, does not yet run OS X application with a GUI". ![]() I dont know exactly how iTerm 2s tmux integration works, having never really felt better than just using tmux directly. Then in the control mode section of the man tmux, there is the following description: CONTROL MODE tmux offers a textual interface called control mode. Control-b is the default prefix in tmux, unless you change it in your configuration. But the solutions currently available will not support it : 17 According to man tmux to check the launch option: -C: Start in control mode (see the CONTROL MODE section). This script will create a window with two tabs in the first tmux session. ![]() First, attach to at least one tmux session using tmux -CC. Konsole also has an open bug: bug 372496 - Support tmux control modeĪnother idea would be to run your dear Iterm2 mac binary in your Linux environment. Tmux Integration ¶ This example demonstrates creating windows using the tmux integration.There is an open bug in upstream bugzilla: GNOME/vte#2177 - tmux integration Gnome-terminal doesn't seem to have any support.Terminator has an open issue, somebody seems to be working on it actively :.What you are asking does not seem to be developed on linux yet with the mainstream terminal emulators : Tmux integration now has an advanced flow control feature that will prevent excessive buffering (requires tmux 3.2). Here is a screenshot using the current imgcat script along with iTerm 3.0.2 tmux 2.2 (MacPorts) on OSX El Capitan (10.11. It may not be exactly what you need though. at 5:02 Add a comment 1 Answer Sorted by: 3 It is working now. Edit : see the other answer, give a try to EternalTerminal : It has tmux -CC support and can be installed on linux. iTerm2 supports integration with the tmux -CC control mode, just add -CC while using tmux in iTerm2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |